Realm is a component that can access application-specific security data such as users, roles and permissions. The
Realm translates this application-specific data into a format that Shiro understands so Shiro can in turn provide a single easy-to-understand Subject programming API no matter how many data sources exist or how application-specific your data might be.
Realms usually have a 1-to-1 correlation with a data source such as a relational database, LDAP directory, file system, or other similar resource. As such, implementations of the
Realm interface use data source-specific APIs to discover authorization data (roles, permissions, etc), such as JDBC, File IO, Hibernate or JPA, or any other Data Access API.
A Realm is essentially a security-specific DAO
Because most of these data sources usually store both authentication data (credentials such as passwords) as well as authorization data (such as roles or permissions), every Shiro
Realm can perform both authentication and authorization operations.
If using Shiro’s INI configuration, you define and reference
Realms like any other object in the
[main] section, but they are configured on the
securityManager in one of two ways: explicitly or implicitly.
Based on knowledge of INI configuration thus far, this is an obvious configuration approach. After defining one or more Realms, you set them as a collection property on the
fooRealm = com.company.foo.Realm barRealm = com.company.another.Realm bazRealm = com.company.baz.Realm securityManager.realms = $fooRealm, $barRealm, $bazRealm
Explicit assignment is deterministic - you control exactly which realms are used as well as the order that they will be used for authentication and authorization. Realm ordering effects are described in detail in the Authentication chapter’s Authentication Sequence section.
Implicit assignment can cause unexpected behavior if you change the order in which realms are defined. It is recommended that you avoid this approach and use Explicit Assignment, which has deterministic behavior. It is likely Implicit Assignment will be deprecated/removed from a future Shiro release.
If for some reason you don’t want to explicitly configure the
securityManager.realms property, you can allow Shiro to detect all configured realms and assign them to the
Using this approach, realms are assigned to the
securityManager instance in the order that they are defined.
That is, for the following
blahRealm = com.company.blah.Realm fooRealm = com.company.foo.Realm barRealm = com.company.another.Realm # no securityManager.realms assignment here
basically has the same effect as if the following line were appended:
securityManager.realms = $blahRealm, $fooRealm, $barRealm
However, realize that with implicit assignment, just the order that the realms are defined directly affects how they are consulted during authentication and authorization attempts. If you change their definition order, you will change how the master
Authenticator’s Authentication Sequence functions.
For this reason, and to ensure deterministic behavior, we recommend using Explicit Assignment instead of Implicit Assignment.
Once you understand Shiro’s master Authentication workflow, it is important to know exactly what happens when the
Authenticator interacts with a
Realm during an authentication attempt.
As mentioned in the authentication sequence, just before a
Realm is consulted to perform an authentication attempt, its
supports method is called. If the return value is
true, only then will its
getAuthenticationInfo(token) method be invoked.
Typically a realm will check the type (interface or class) of the submitted token to see if it can process it. For example, a Realm that processes biometric data may not understand
UsernamePasswordTokens at all, in which case it would return
false from the
supports a submitted
Authenticator will call the Realm’s getAuthenticationInfo(token) method. This effectively represents an authentication attempt with the
Realm's backing data source. The method, in order:
tokenfor the identifying principal (account identifying information)
principal, looks up corresponding account data in the data source
credentialsmatches those stored in the data store
This is the highest-level workflow for all Realm
getAuthenticationInfo implementations. Realms are free to do whatever they want during this method, such as record the attempt in an audit log, update data records, or anything else that makes sense for the authentication attempt for that data store.
The only thing required is that, if the credentials match for the given principal(s), that a non-null
AuthenticationInfo instance is returned that represents Subject account information from that data source.
Implementing `Realm` interface directly might be time consuming and error prone. Most people choose to subclass the AuthorizingRealm abstract class instead of starting from scratch. This class implements common authentication and authorization workflow to save you time and effort.
In the above realm authentication workflow, a Realm has to verify that the Subject’s submitted credentials (e.g. password) must match the credentials stored in the data store. If they match, authentication is considered successful, and the system has verified the end-user’s identity.
It is each Realm's responsibility to match submitted credentials with those stored in the Realm's backing data store, and not the `Authenticator's` responsibility. Each `Realm` has intimate knowledge of credentials format and storage and can perform detailed credentials matching, whereas the `Authenticator` is a generic workflow component.
The credentials matching process is nearly identical in all applications and usually only differs by the data compared. To ensure this process is pluggable and customizable if necessary, the AuthenticatingRealm and its subclasses support the concept of a CredentialsMatcher to perform the credentials comparison.
After discovering account data, it and the submitted
AuthenticationToken are presented to a
CredentialsMatcher to see if what was submitted matches what is stored in the data store.
Shiro has some
CredentialsMatcher implementations to get you started out of the box, such as the SimpleCredentialsMatcher and HashedCredentialsMatcher implementations, but if you wanted to configure a custom implementation for custom matching logic, you could do so directly:
Realm myRealm = new com.company.shiro.realm.MyRealm(); CredentialsMatcher customMatcher = new com.company.shiro.realm.CustomCredentialsMatcher(); myRealm.setCredentialsMatcher(customMatcher);
Or, if using Shiro’s INI configuration:
[main] ... customMatcher = com.company.shiro.realm.CustomCredentialsMatcher myRealm = com.company.shiro.realm.MyRealm myRealm.credentialsMatcher = $customMatcher ...
All of Shiro’s out-of-the-box
Realm implementations default to using a SimpleCredentialsMatcher. The
SimpleCredentialsMatcher performs a plain direct equality check of the stored account credentials with what was submitted in the
For example, if a UsernamePasswordToken was submitted, the
SimpleCredentialsMatcher verifies that the password submitted is exactly equal to the password stored in the database.
SimpleCredentialsMatcher performs direct equality comparisons for more than just Strings though. It can work with most common byte sources, such as Strings, character arrays, byte arrays, Files and InputStreams. See its JavaDoc for more.
Instead of storing credentials in their raw form and performing raw/plain comparisons, a much more secure way of storing end-user’s credentials (e.g. passwords) is to one-way hash them first before storing them in the data store.
This ensures that end-users’ credentials are never stored in their raw form and that no one can know the original/raw value. This is a much more secure mechanism than plain-text or raw comparisons, and all security-conscious applications should favor this approach over non-hashed storage.
To support these preferred cryptographic hashing strategies, Shiro provides HashedCredentialsMatcher implementations to be configured on realms instead of the aforementioned
Hashing credentials and the benefits of salting and multiple hash iterations are outside the scope of this
Realm documentation, but definitely read the HashedCredentialsMatcher JavaDoc which covers these principles in detail.
So how do you configure a Shiro-enabled application to do this easily?
Shiro provides multiple
HashedCredentialsMatcher subclass implementations. You must configure the specific implementation on your realm to match the hashing algorithm you use to hash your users’ credentials.
For example, let’s say your application uses username/password pairs for authentication. And due to the benefits of hashing credentials described above, let’s say you want to one-way hash a user’s password using the SHA-256 algorithm when you create a user account. You would hash the user’s entered plain-text password and save that value:
import org.apache.shiro.crypto.hash.Sha256Hash; import org.apache.shiro.crypto.RandomNumberGenerator; import org.apache.shiro.crypto.SecureRandomNumberGenerator; ... //We'll use a Random Number Generator to generate salts. This //is much more secure than using a username as a salt or not //having a salt at all. Shiro makes this easy. // //Note that a normal app would reference an attribute rather //than create a new RNG every time: RandomNumberGenerator rng = new SecureRandomNumberGenerator(); Object salt = rng.nextBytes(); //Now hash the plain-text password with the random salt and multiple //iterations and then Base64-encode the value (requires less space than Hex): String hashedPasswordBase64 = new Sha256Hash(plainTextPassword, salt, 1024).toBase64(); User user = new User(username, hashedPasswordBase64); //save the salt with the new account. The HashedCredentialsMatcher //will need it later when handling login attempts: user.setPasswordSalt(salt); userDAO.create(user);
SHA-256 hashing your user’s passwords, you need to tell Shiro to use the appropriate
HashedCredentialsMatcher to match your hashing preferences. In this example, we create a random salt and perform 1024 hash iterations for strong security (see the
HashedCredentialsMatcher JavaDoc for why). Here is the Shiro INI configuration to make this work:
[main] ... credentialsMatcher = org.apache.shiro.authc.credential.Sha256CredentialsMatcher # base64 encoding, not hex in this example: credentialsMatcher.storedCredentialsHexEncoded = false credentialsMatcher.hashIterations = 1024 # This next property is only needed in Shiro 1.0\. Remove it in 1.1 and later: credentialsMatcher.hashSalted = true ... myRealm = com.company..... myRealm.credentialsMatcher = $credentialsMatcher ...
The last thing to do to ensure this works is that your
Realm implementation must return a SaltedAuthenticationInfo instance instead of a normal
AuthenticationInfo one. The
SaltedAuthenticationInfo interface ensures that the salt that you used when you created the user account (e.g. the
user.setPasswordSalt(salt); call above) can be referenced by the
HashedCredentialsMatcher needs the salt in order to perform the same hashing technique on the submitted
AuthenticationToken to see if the token matches what you saved in the data store. So if you use salting for user passwords (and you should!!!), ensure your
Realm implementation represents that by returning
If for some reason, you don’t want a Realm to perform authentication for a data source (maybe because you only want the Realm to perform authorization), you can disable a Realm’s support for authentication entirely by always returning
false from the Realm’s
supports method. Then your realm will never be consulted during an authentication attempt.
Of course at least one configured
Realm needs to be able to support AuthenticationTokens if you want to authenticate Subjects.
When one of the overloaded method hasRoles or checkRoles method is called on Subject
SecurityManagerfor identifying if the given Role is assigned
SecurityManagerthen delegates to
When one of the overloaded method
checkPermission() method are called on Subject:
Subjectdelegates the task to grant or deny Permission to SecurityManager
SecurityManagerthen delegates to Authorizer
a. First it gets identify all Permissions assigned to Subject directly by calling getObjectPermissions() and getStringPermissions methods on AuthorizationInfo and aggregating the results.
b. If a RolePermissionResolver is registered, it is used to retrieve Permissions based on all of the roles assigned to Subject by calling the
c. For aggregated Permissions from a. and b. the implies() method is called to check if any of these permission are implied the checked permission. See WildcardPermission
While we hope this documentation helps you with the work you're doing with Apache Shiro, the community is improving and expanding the documentation all the time. If you'd like to help the Shiro project, please consider correcting, expanding, or adding documentation where you see a need. Every little bit of help you provide expands the community and in turn improves Shiro.